PMC 2010 – 26th Year Fighting Cancer

The cancer road stretches far into the distance. More and more people engage in a a personal fight against the disease. Therefore, we all need to fight on with them.

Regulate HIT Tools as Medical Devices? Yes and No

Regulation of HIT tools as medical devices is currently premature. The regulations must be constructed to advance HIT use while simultaneously protecting patients.

Health IT’s Glue

The future of health IT over the next five years is in the development of these “glue” applications that allow the seamless linking of large, robust system, such as EMRs or laboratory applications, so that end users can utilize these tools in a coherent, patient-centric manner.

Keynote Adddress at HIMSS 2010 Annual Conference

Our great country is on an unsustainable healthcare cost curve that threatens our ability to bounce back from the severe economic challenges we now face.

Recent Articles:

PMC 2010 – 26th Year Fighting Cancer

July 23, 2010 Featured, Interests No Comments
PMC 2010 – 26th Year Fighting Cancer

Dear Friend,

The cancer road stretches far into the distance. More and more people engage in a a personal fight against the disease. Therefore, we all need to fight on with them.

It’s been 26 years since my dad succumbed to cancer. He was brave, never showing fear. A year after his death, in 1985, I rode my first Pan-Mass Challenge, a charity cycling event that raises funds for the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute located in Boston, MA . The August 7-8 PMC is my 26th ride and one I am looking forward to as much as any of them. The PMC is my opportunity to engage in the fight against cancer while honoring my dad. I sure wish he was here to watch.CV PMC 2009 BPC start

Over these years, I rode for friends, colleagues, and people I did not know. I hoped to offer them hope and comfort through my connection to the wonderful PMC family. Perhaps the knowledge that over 6,000 riders and volunteers really cared provided them with a bit of help as they went through one more day fighting cancer. This fight will forever be personal. It has touched my family too hard to ever be forgotten.

Thank you for being part of my PMC family and supporting me now and in years past. Without you, this ride is just 193 miles long. With you, it is a crusade, that we are winning, against a disease that hurts too many of us. Please consider boldly investing in the miracles that are unfolding today. Every single dollar (100%) of your PMC donation fights cancer. We raised more than $30,000,000 last year, reaching $270 mil. overall. I think we can do better.

Times may be tough for us, but times are tougher for those who are fighting cancer. I need you, and those looking for hope need you.

See you on the road.

CV BPCSig2009

To make an online eGift donation click here

or

Send checks made out to Pan-Mass Challenge to me at:

Barry P. Chaiken
14 Durham Street
Boston, MA 02115

—————————————————————————————————————————————————-

About the Pan-Mass Challenge

The Pan-Massachusetts Challenge raises money for life-saving cancer research and treatment at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute through an annual bike-a-thon that crosses the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Since its founding in 1980, the PMC has successfully melded support from committed cyclists, volunteers, corporate sponsors and individual contributors. All are essential to the PMC’s goal and model: to attain maximum fundraising efficiency while increasing its annual gift. Our hope and aspiration is to provide Dana-Farber’s doctors and researchers the necessary resources to discover cures for all cancers.

Regulate HIT Tools as Medical Devices? Yes and No

May 27, 2010 Featured, Health IT, Healthcare Policy Comments Off
Regulate HIT Tools as Medical Devices? Yes and No

The Food and Drug Administration recently announced it is reconsidering its previous decision to exclude health information technology (HIT) tools from regulation as medical devices. When last evaluated in the late 1990s, this decision made common sense. At that time HIT consisted of rudimentary clinical documentation systems, electronic reference materials, and administrative applications. As even these tools were not well integrated with each other and into clinical workflow, they represented more of a digitization of paper-based activities rather than something truly transformational.

Today, HIT functionality far outstrips what was even dreamed about 10+ years ago. In addition, applications function in an integrated manner truly providing the clinician with a clinical experience much different than that offered using paper-based clinical documentation or simple clinical decision support tools.

The role of physicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals is changing. These providers are becoming more dependent upon the clinical content within the HIT tools, often deferring to “decisions” made by these tools. Such examples include differential diagnosis, prescribed diagnostic and therapeutic treatments, choice of drug, and drug dose calculations. Although the previous rationale for not considering such HIT tools medical devices was based upon the intermediation of the provider between the recommended clinical activity and actual actions taken on behalf of the patient, the strong reliance on these very sophisticated HIT tools today puts this premise into question.

The FDA must study in detail the quality and safety issues inherent in integrated HIT applications before rushing to regulate HIT tools as medical devices. An uninformed effort to regulate HIT tools as medical devices may cause more harm than good. Applying the same standards used for medical devices to HIT tools makes little sense as HIT is neither a standalone application nor strictly a medical device. They are integrated applications that can impact quality and safety in ways far dissimilar to standard medical devices.

Regulation of HIT tools as medical devices is currently premature. Although HIT tools do directly impact patient care and therefore surely require some level of regulation, such regulation cannot be done without the requisite understanding of how HIT works within clinical workflow. The regulations must be constructed to advance HIT use while simultaneously protecting patients.

Excerpts from: – Regulate HIT Tools as Medical Devices? Yes and No. May/June, 2010

Photo Courtesy of  Don Guerwitz PhotographyRunning the Rapids, Mae Hong Son, Thailand

Health IT’s Glue

Health IT’s Glue

In my last column “Raison d’Être” I wrote about the importance of staying focused on making healthcare IT work to achieve the four important goals noted above: patient safety, quality care, access to care, and cost savings. In March, I addressed the HIMSS membership with these words:

Healthcare information technology is the instrument that will transform healthcare, and it is we—the informaticists, clinicians, management engineers, senior IT executives, IT specialists, and the diverse talents of so many others—who will create the applications, processes and workflows that will improve quality, safety, access and cost-efficiency.

In addition to our effort to transform care delivery through deployment of innovative software, revised processes, and creative workflows, niche applications are becoming available that allow the varied health IT tools to be sewn together to allow us to effectively tap into their potential. Without these applications we could not achieve the necessary integration of systems that permits the construction of meaningful, efficient workflows. Such workflows allow clinicians to deliver quality care safely and efficiently while satisfying the work requirements of caregivers.

The future of health IT over the next five years is in the development of these “glue” applications that allow the seamless linking of large, robust system, such as EMRs or laboratory applications, so that end users can utilize these tools in a coherent, patient-centric manner.

Excerpts from: – Health IT’s Glue. March/April, 2010

Photo Courtesy of  Don Guerwitz PhotographyAngkor Watt. Siem Riep, Cambodia

Keynote Adddress at HIMSS 2010 Annual Conference

Keynote Adddress at HIMSS 2010 Annual Conference

(Opening address given at HIMSS 2010 Annual Conference, Georgia World Congress Center, Atlanta, GA, March 1, 2010.)
For PDF of keynote address, click here.

Click here to watch video presentation – Part 1 of 3.

Click here to watch video presentation – Part 2 of 3.

Click here to watch video presentation – Part 3 of 3.

Click here to download and view video presentation.

Our great country is on an unsustainable healthcare cost curve that threatens our ability to bounce back from the severe economic challenges we now face. In addition, healthcare quality and safety, as well as access to care, sit at disappointing levels, especially considering the resources our nation expends on healthcare.

While these healthcare challenges are daunting, I believe the solutions to them must and will come from the professionals sitting in this room and from our colleagues across the country and around the world. Healthcare information technology is the instrument that will transform healthcare and it is we – the informaticists, clinicians, management engineers, senior IT executives, IT specialists and the diverse talents of so many others – who will create the applications, processes and workflows that will improve quality, safety, access and cost-efficiency.

I am confident that we can make this transformation happen because similar revolutions relating to technology and the workplace have happened quite recently. For example, consider the huge changes in how we communicate with each other. Throughout this week, we all will be periodically checking our e-mail inboxes to stay in touch and communicate. According to Merriam-Webster, it was in 1969 that the term “inbox” first entered the American lexicon, to describe a physical tray holding incoming mail and work documents. Over the next 40-plus years, the inbox morphed into an electronic tray where important messages and information are stored. Today, the inbox pervades our working and personal lives, present on our personal computers and mobile smart phones.

The story of the inbox is in many ways the story of the American economy over the past four decades. The inbox tells the story of how a manufacturing-based industrial economy became an information- and knowledge-based service economy driven by data and analytics. The inbox tells the story of how savvy businesses began to share information quickly and inexpensively. These businesses effectively leveraged this information to deliver higher quality products at lower costs. By meeting the needs of their customers, their profits grew while profits of their competitors’ shrank. New ventures sprouted to support these innovators with brand new knowledge-based products. Smart companies thrived in this new data—driven marketplace; others – either unable or unwilling to adapt – could no longer compete.

While most American industries became more efficient and streamlined as a result of these economic realities, healthcare in many ways remained frozen in time. Today, the cost of the American health care system, at 17 percent of GDP, is a millstone around the neck of American businesses, raising the costs of production, stealing wages from the pockets of workers, and restricting the ability of American companies to compete globally. Health care here costs at least 50 percent more than it does in any other industrial country, and according to the World Health Organization, our health care system underperforms in quality, safety, and access to care. In 2006 we ranked 39th for infant mortality, 43rd for adult female mortality, 42nd for adult male mortality, and 36th for life expectancy. According to a 2008 study reported in the Journal of Health Affairs, the United States trails every single country in the 30-nation Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in amenable age-standardized death rates, meaning, we are worst at preventing unnecessary death in people under the age of 74. Isn’t the whole point of healthcare delivery to create wellness and prevent unnecessary death? Sadly, we are not doing very well.

In many respects, our health care system still operates like the typical business of 1969 – it is still largely paper-based, it ignores information tools that can facilitate evidence-based best practices, and it functions without analytics to qualify and quantify the care we provide. Medical decisions are made according to implicit criteria – hidden internal knowledge – rather than explicit criteria – external knowledge that can be checked, evaluated, and updated. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care provides documented proof of glaring, unacceptable variations in how health care is provided and sheds light on disparities existing across the country. Too many providers are not taking advantage of 21st-century technologies to access 21st century information, choosing instead to provide care the same way it was done 40 years ago.

How can we change this? While enacting healthcare reform legislation remains a critical need, any health care bill will primarily impact reimbursement policy, not the transformation of care delivery.  And, because the task of transforming our health care system to meet the challenges of the 21st century remains to those of us who work in the system, as the HIMSS board chair, I direct these three important messages to your inbox today:

One: HIMSS will play a leading role in the transformation of American health care by effecting positive change in four key areas: quality, safety, access to care and cost.

Two: HIMSS’s purpose – our reason for being – is this health care transformation.

Three: As members of HIMSS, you are the leaders who will create the solutions that will drive this transformation. Through the implementation of compelling healthcare IT solutions, you must transform the way health care is provided in this country. Not the president, not Congress, not clinicians – you. If you don’t do it, it will not happen. You must step forward and you must lead.

As I begin to make the case for why and how healthcare IT will transform health care, I’d like to take us all back to 1981, the year I graduated from medical school. Back then, people spent a good part of each workday managing paper. Upon returning from lunch, a busy executive was handed a pile of pink while you were out messages. She, or more likely he, would find a report draft on top of a bulging inbox. Attached to the report was a brand new, very popular, high-tech item of the day – a post-it note – where the boss scribbled a message to review and advise by writing comments in the margins. On his desk for his signature was a series of letters that his secretary had revised using another technological marvel – white-out. Reminded to call a key contact for advice on an important matter, the executive would quickly thumb through his rolodex to find the telephone number.

During my time as an Epidemic Intelligence Service officer with the Centers for Disease Control back in the 1980s, I do remember working this way. My first outbreak investigation was a foodborne illness on a cruise ship sailing out of Pittsburgh on the Ohio River. When investigating these type of outbreaks, my first task was to construct attack-rate tables that try to statistically identify the food that made people ill. I built these tables by doing all the calculations on a handheld calculator. No PCs were available to me at that time. Needless to say, it took me a few hours to complete the table and identify the cause of the outbreak.

Back then, we were very comfortable going about our business in this fashion and saw no need to change. Still, over the following several years and continuing into the 1990s, the workplace began to change immensely due to personal computers, e-mail and the Internet. Workers did not need to be encouraged to use this technology. They wanted to use it, even demanded to use it, because it made their jobs easier and made them more productive.

Today, in 2010, we must begin to change healthcare in the same fashion – by creating healthcare IT solutions that are so compelling, so irresistible, that people just want to use them. We cannot rely on incentive programs or executive orders.  We must create demand.

We must create electronic systems so appealing that they make physicians want to leave their paper medical records behind. We must create clinical decision support systems that make it routine for physicians to check their internal knowledge with data and evidence. We must offer workflow solutions that improve the efficiency of using health IT. We must make physicians want, yes, demand the enormous power that IT brings to the practice of medicine.

Creating this demand is important because it will improve quality, safety, access to care and cost-efficiency. Simply, we have to change a paper-based system in which most clinical decisions are made primarily by intuitive judgment – based on the ability to recall disparate facts – into an electronic system enabling decisions to be made according to data and evidence.

We must provide clinical decision support tools that reduce the burden of recalling facts and help to assess patients, form diagnoses, and choose therapeutic paths. Healthcare IT opens the door to this higher level of medical practice, one where both physicians and nurses can concentrate on examining, interacting, and motivating patients while technology handles the burdens of collecting, storing and accessing data. The knowledge of best practices and evidence-based care must be delivered to every single clinician at every point of care so that every patient everywhere receives care according this latest knowledge, rather than according to the habits of a clinician disconnected from this knowledge.

American medicine, right now, is relying too heavily on recalling facts. Perhaps the clearest example of this fact is the Pronovost checklist. Each year, about 28,000 Americans die due to I-V line infections. In response, Peter Pronovost, a Johns Hopkins physician, developed a list of five simple steps that intensive-care doctors should take to prevent the introduction of bacteria when inserting an I-V line. Physicians working at 108 hospitals in Michigan adopted the five steps and reduced the infection rate to essentially zero. A paper about their success was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2006. But, today, most American intensive-care doctors still don’t use the checklist. They continue to rely on their ability to remember what to do each time they insert an I-V line. Most times, they get it right. The few times they don’t, people die unnecessarily from infections. This is crazy. Every physician I know wants to help patients, not hurt them. Yet, we are hurting them.

It’s up to healthcare IT to make knowledge such as the Pronovost checklist more readily available and its discovery and use more intuitive. This work will require the design of clinical decision-support systems and other tools that merge seamlessly with patient care activities. This work will not just distribute best practices, but embed them into the workflow of medical practice. This work requires a unique multi-disciplinary effort involving not only workflow experts but also virtually any person connected with clinical care.

Bringing this level of sophistication and beyond to American health care will signify true transformation and will require all of the diverse talents represented within HIMSS. No matter who you are, whether you are a senior IT executive, a clinician or an engineer – whether you come from a hospital, a community or public health organization, a clinical practice, a payer or a pharmaceutical company – or whether your primary interest is patient safety, quality, research, privacy, or return on investment – we need you to contribute to the cause of transforming health care through IT.

HIMSS is reaching out to new groups and communities who must engage in the transformation. For example, our Life Sciences Community initiative actively engages pharmaceutical and life science companies, medical researchers, practicing clinicians, the academic community, and device manufacturers. This initiative concentrates on improving the quality, access and usefulness of data through interoperability and interconnectivity – data that can lead to new medical discoveries and treatments. With Board approval, I recently appointed Debra Bremer, Vice President at Pfizer, as an advisor to our Board to offer guidance in these efforts.

Our Payer Community initiative recognizes the shift from the payer playing the role of a transaction manager to one of a care delivery partner focused on improving chronic care management and overall patient outcomes. With Board approval, I also recently appointed Kevin Hayden, President at WellPoint, as an advisor to our Board to provide guidance in these efforts.

Both Debra and Kevin have been working hard with our staff to engage these two communities as we have engaged other industry specialty areas in our effort to transform healthcare through IT. To further involve and educate professionals we need to achieve our goal, HIMSS also has launched a Diversity Business Roundtable, created and delivered numerous distance learning opportunities, and reached out to several academic institutions.

Transforming healthcare requires the development of imaginative solutions. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles did just that to improve hand-washing compliance, according to a story in the New York Times. Several research studies have reported that health care providers wash or disinfect their hands in less than half of situations where they should, with physicians being among the worst offenders. In an effort to achieve 90 percent or better hand-washing compliance in advance of a Joint Commission inspection, Cedars-Sinai first tried a campaign of e-mails, faxes and posters, but that didn’t work.  Then, a group of physicians and hospital administrators – who dubbed themselves the Hand Hygiene Safety Posse – started handing out bottles of Purell to physicians rounding on wards or as they stepped out of their cars in the parking lot. Also, the posse awarded a $10 Starbucks card as a reward to any physician “caught” washing his or her hands. This tactic improved compliance from 65 to 80 percent but still fell short of the 90 percent goal.

After delivering these discouraging results to the medical center’s chief of staff advisory group of roughly 20 doctors, the hospital’s epidemiologist handed each doctor a sterile petri dish loaded with a spongy layer of agar. “I would love to culture your hand,” she said.

The resulting cultures were photographed. The images were – in the exact words of the epidemiologist – “disgusting and striking, with gobs of colonies of bacteria.”

But here’s the best part – and where IT comes into play: the hospital harnessed the power of this disgusting image by making it into a screen saver that haunted every computer in Cedars-Sinai. Reluctance to hand washing vanished in the face of this filthy evidence, and compliance shot up to nearly 100 percent, where it remains today. Cedars-Sinai urologist Dr. Leon Bender said in the Times article: “With people who have been in practice 25 or 30 or 40 years, it’s hard to change their behavior. But when you present them with good data, they change their behavior very rapidly.”

Now, Cedars-Sinai obviously did not employ leading-edge IT sophistication to solve its problem.  But I chose to share this story with you because it’s a wonderful example of fast and practical problem solving. It shows how you can solve an important safety problem, relatively quickly, through multidisciplinary teamwork, data gathering and a little bit of IT. Oh, and let’s not forget about some good marketing. I chose to tell this story because I want you to think of what problem of a similar nature you might solve. And how you can work to gather the team and fix it.

This week we will hear about many other examples of problem solving and achievement. This year’s Davies Award winners, for example, have impressively improved access to care, quality performance, cost-efficiency and safety. The 19 hospitals that have achieved the HIMSS Analytics Stage 7 recognition represent the first of the truly paperless hospitals and give all other hospitals something to emulate.

But I have purposely crafted my remarks today to emphasize that it’s no longer about what others have done or what others are doing.  It’s now about what you and your organization are doing to transform American health care. I suspect that some of you may see yourselves clearly within this context while others may not. Let me suggest to you today that no matter who you are and what your role is, you have an important if not critical role to play to achieve transformation. You can fulfill your role by building a multidisciplinary team with the expertise needed to solve a problem. You can fulfill your role by gathering and sharing data and evidence as you go along. And you can fulfill your role by having the courage to stay the course or to change your mind – whatever the situation calls for. Great science comes from flip-flopping – it’s O-K to change your point of view as you gain new knowledge.

The challenge before us now is to help all health care organizations to achieve the standards set by the leaders. Indeed, we are succeeding in changing the culture. We have reached the tipping point. Health IT isn’t just for early adopters anymore; it is expected of all.

I send this urgent message to your inbox today: the transformation of American health care by improving access, quality, safety and cost-efficiency is a cause to which we all must dedicate ourselves. Identify a project, engage experts different from you, embrace diversity, form a team, try something unique, make mistakes, redouble your efforts, celebrate your successes, and then start again with a new idea. It is you who will discover something new. It is you who will develop the needed solutions. It is you who will effectively implement change. It is you who will transform healthcare. It’s your job to act now upon the message in your inbox and to place your contribution to a transformed American health care system in your out-box in due time. Thank you.

Barry P. Chaiken, MD, FHIMSS
2009-10 Chair HIMSS
CMO, DocsNetwork, Ltd.

News from HIMSS 2010 Annual Conference

February 26, 2010 Health IT No Comments
News from HIMSS 2010 Annual Conference

Comments for Saturday, February 27,2010

The professionals are streaming into Atlanta and the buzz is starting to crescendo. Of course the Jay-Z concert in town has a bit to do with all the action on the street.

This evening, I visited with our French and Belgium HIMSS representatives at a reception at the W Hotel downtown. They traveled almost 24 hours from Paris to Newark to Atlanta. After stepping off their airport shuttle they headed directly into the welcome event. At this time of significant challenges facing healthcare in America, we can learn much from our European colleagues. In turn there is much we can teach them. The strength of  HIMSS is in its diversity. Its enthusiasm and power was felt throughout the room.

At an earlier reception hosted by Evolvent, Inc. I met several distinguished colleagues in the DOD, working hard to endure that our men and women in uniform recieve the best care we can provide. Several shared stories of innovative projects focused on improving care in the combat theater and facilities at home. Our military faces similar challneges to those in the civillian sector. Interest in HIMSS grows from the notion that there is more than enough to learn, requiring that everyone share as much knowledge as possible.

Barry P. Chaiken, MD, FHIMSS
HIMSS Chair, 2009-2010

———————————————————————————————————–

Are We At A Health IT Tipping Point?

February 26, 2010

Last week, I had the privilege of speaking with Dr. Barry Chaiken, current HIMSS Chair and recently appointed CMO at Imprivata, an authentication and access management company. Our conversation revolved around the steps that need to occur in order to improve the accessibility of information, quality of care, and cost effectiveness within the U.S. healthcare system. According to Chaiken, two primary obstacles have prevented the healthcare industry from making significant strides in these areas. The first is the challenge of getting disparate health IT systems to effectively integrate with one another. The second is convincing healthcare organizations to truly change their workflow processes to make best use of the technologies available.    Read More>>

———————————————————————————————————–

Podcast: Dr. Barry Chaiken discusses HIMSS 2010, electronic health records

By Scot Petersen, Editorial Director, SearchHealthIT.com

In this SearchHealthIT.com podcast, Dr. Barry Chaiken, HIMSS board chairman and Chief Medical Officer of Imprivata and Imprivata CEO Omar Hussain discuss HIMSS 2010 and how technology is transforming health care. Chaiken addresses the place that electronic health record initiatives have in health care, and  how health care practices are adopting to technology. Hussain discusses Imprivata’s new health care division and why he brought in Chaiken as CMO.

To hear podcast click here >> SearchHealthIT.com – Dr. Barry Chaiken Discusses HIMSS 2010, EHRs.

Click here >> Access SearchHealthIT.com website and podcast

Raison d’Être

January 7, 2010 Featured, Health IT No Comments
Raison d’Être

What is the purpose of health information technology? Why are we spending all these billions of dollars on this “thing” we struggle to understand, implement, and use? Is it achieving the goals of its purpose?

The French elaborated on the concept of “raison d’être,” suggesting that once the reason an object exists is defined, criteria to measure the object’s value can be developed and applied. Now that the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT has finally released the definitions of “meaningful use,” it is worthwhile to step back and reexamine the reason health IT exists.

The raison d’être of health IT includes four key items: 1) enhance patient safety, 2) improve quality of care, 3) foster greater accessibility, and 4) facilitate a reduction in medical costs. In addition, all of these items must occur simultaneously and in cooperation with each other. There is no zero sum game in achieving these goals, as failure to advance one brings failure to all.

Considering the current state of healthcare delivery in the United States, the four aspects of raison d’être for health IT, as defined above, seem appropriate and timely. While our healthcare costs per capita are the highest in the world, we endure worse outcomes, poor accessibility to care, high rates of uninsured and under insured, and unacceptable levels of medical errors. Few can deny the poor value we obtain from the resources expended on care.

So how and when do reap these rewards of health IT? Those that embrace flexibility, creativity, and tenacity will be most successful.

Flexibility. Health IT is nothing more than a tool. It is how the person that wields that tool acts that delivers real value. We are at the stage where our understanding of the health IT tool is just beginning. Therefore, we must be flexible in how we use that tool, wielding it in different ways to discover how to achieve greater and greater value.

Creativity. It is not enough just to be flexible. Flexibility has value only when it is utilized by creativity, the development of new and innovative approaches to problems. Creativity is needed in the design of processes and workflows that utilize health IT tools in a flexible manner, allowing these new approaches to be tried, reworked, and reapplied. It allows for the evolution of the use of health IT.

Tenacity. Clinical care is complicated and uniquely personal. This latter characteristic separates the use of IT in the healthcare industry from its use in other markets. This personal, and therefore human, factor makes what is very complex even more so. The complexity requires a level of tenacity, “stick-to-it-iveness,” that can carry us through challenges, problems, and failures until we are able to get the technology, processes, and workflows blended synergistically together, delivering our expected benefits.

As we consider all that has occurred in the past year, including the raucous effort to reform healthcare, the $19+ billion earmarked for health IT, and the debate on meaningful use, we must remember our need to be flexible, creative, and tenacious. No single effort or event can make health IT valuable. Only through our dedicated work, application of our professionalism, and our keeping focused on the raison d’être can we achieve the benefits we seek from health IT.

Excerpts from: – Raison d’Être, PSQH, January/February, 2010.

Photo Courtesy of  Don Guerwitz PhotographyBathed in Light, Strasbourg, France.

Looking Back…and Looking Ahead…on the Progress of EHR Implementation

Looking Back…and Looking Ahead…on the Progress of EHR Implementation

In the December 2010 issue of the HIMSS Digital Office, leaders in health information technology share their perspective on the progress of EMR adoption in 2009…and their vision for implementation of electronic health records in 2010. Barry P. Chaiken, MD, FHIMSS, HIMSS Chair shares his vision on adotpion below. This is reprinted from that publication.

What do you think is the greatest achievement in health IT in 2009?
Advances in technology just offer new tools, while advances in politics, represented by meaningful funding levels, provide momentum for real change. The billions of dollars provided to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT established the ONC as a true driver of advances in health IT use. The appointment of a healthcare policy expert David Blumenthal, MD, rather than an informaticist, signals that the Obama Administration is serious about promoting the use of health IT through policy changes that impact how healthcare is delivered in the United States. In addition, recruiting John Glaser, even on his current temporary basis, partners Dr. Blumenthal with one of the country’s leading health IT experts, Therefore, solidifying the funding of the ONC, and appointing Dr. Blumenthal and Mr. Glaser is 2009’s top health IT achievement that will positively impact the use of health IT to deliver safe, high quality and cost effective healthcare.

What would you like to see happen in 2010 to help move forward the adoption of electronic medical records?
When ATMs first appeared in the 1970s, interconnected financial networks did not exist. Customers of a bank could only use their ATM cards in machines provided by their bank. There was no ATM interoperability. The banks soon realized that providing ATM interoperability was considerably less expensive than installing proprietary ATM machines throughout the country. In addition, interoperability gave all banks a national, rather than regional, presence as customers could withdraw funds from any connected ATM. To advance the adoption of EMRs, information technology vendors must honestly embrace interoperability, building their systems to easily accept and exchange clinical data. True interoperability would provide clinicians with more complete patient records allowing for better quality care. Offering a more complete record that provides more value to the clinician strongly works to advance the adoption of health IT applications.

Photo Courtesy of Don Guerwitz Photography - Rooftop Statues, La Pedrera. Barcelona, Spain.

Hospital Computerization Not a Budget Saver, Concludes Study

Hospital Computerization Not a Budget Saver, Concludes Study

By Joshua Feblowitz

The recent survey of over four thousand hospitals found no connection between computerization and reduced costs. In addition, increased computerization led to only small improvements in the quality of care.

Researchers found that more “wired” hospitals had higher total costs and more rapid cost increases. They also examined a list of the “100 Most Wired” hospitals and determined that these institutions had performed no better in terms of administrative expenses or quality of care.

These findings contradict previous anecdotal evidence indicating the benefits of healthcare information technology (IT), a category that includes systems such as electronic medical records and computerized order entry. The study has sparked significant controversy, in part because President Obama and others have widely promoted healthcare IT as a tool for saving money and improving healthcare. The 2009 stimulus bill included over $19 billion to encourage the adoption of healthcare technologies.

Using twenty-four different measures of hospital technology, researchers created a composite “computerization score” and compared this with changes in administrative costs and quality of care during the years 2003 to 2007. The only area in which they found significant improvement was in the quality of care for heart attacks.

“There’s no evidence that what we are doing is actually working,” says lead author Dr. David Himmelstein, a professor at Harvard Medical School, who calls promises of improved quality and reduced costs “propaganda of the healthcare IT industry.”

“It’s easier than saying what needs to be said,” Himmelstein argues. “We need to abolish the private health insurance industry. It’s much easier to say that there’s a silver bullet here, and all we need to do is install these fancy machines.”

However, these results, experts say, are far from definitive. Certain hospital computer systems have proven to yield substantial benefits. Computerized physician order entry, for example, a technology used to enter prescriptions and order tests, has been shown to greatly improve the quality of care. Even things as simple as adding barcodes to medications can dramatically reduce medical errors, says Dr. Barry Chaiken, chair of the Health Information Management Systems Society.

These types of improvements in quality are well documented. A study at Brigham & Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, showed that computerized order entry systems could reduce serious errors by up to 55 percent and the overall error rate by over 80 percent.

Computerization accomplishes these improvements, experts argue, by giving hospitals the ability to manage information more efficiently. “When a facility installs software, they are looking for something that gives them better control over the chaos in their department,” says Keith Herron, representative for Patient Care Technology Systems, a healthcare IT company. “They also want to be able to document the patient encounter and document more fully.”

“If your physician has more information about your health, they are likely to make better decisions,” says Dr. Ashish Jha, professor at Harvard Medical School. “In a paper-based world, important pieces of information are often missing. Mistakes aren’t caught as easily. There are many ways in which technology if designed and implemented effectively can improve quality.”

Experts also criticize the study’s methods of examining hospital computerization. “This study is very problematic because both their measures of cost and their measures of technology have serious limitations,” says Jha.

“If you look at something and don’t find it, it could be that there’s no effect,” Jha continues, “Or, it could be that the way you looked at it didn’t make sense.” Specifically, Jha notes that the study’s “computerization score” included factors unrelated to patient care, such as accounting and staff scheduling.

Jha also says that the study’s measures of costs and quality are very broad and may not accurately reflect the benefits of healthcare information technology. Data on computerization was reported by hospitals and collected by the Health Information Management Systems Society. Researchers compiled this data into their own composite scores of quality, costs and computerization before performing statistical analysis.

Others suggest the reason for these findings is that current hospital systems simply aren’t very advanced. Although many hospitals spend a great deal on information technology, says Dr. Robert Kolodner, former National Coordinator for Healthcare IT, the number of hospitals with sophisticated electronic health records is “vanishingly small,” less than two percent.

“They are using the best data they have,” agrees Chaiken. “But I don’t think we’ve reached a tipping point as to what healthcare IT can do.”

In addition, experts say, healthcare IT is only beneficial if applied in the correct way. “It all comes down to how you implement these systems,” says Dr. Adam Wright, co-author of the study, “It’s not the technical quality of the system that you purchase but the way you use it.”

In order to benefit from these technologies, says Dr. Michael Siegel, head of the Digital Health group at MIT, we must accept new approaches to healthcare. “We’re managing the process, moving at incredible speeds, as if things were still the same. There has been lots research done that when you introduce IT and don’t change what you’re doing, it doesn’t help.”

“I would call for some patience,” says Wright, who likens the process of development to the construction of the Transcontinental Railroad. “Imagine you’re building a railroad. Laying tracks across the country. It’s very boring and very expensive. And until you hammer in the Golden Spike, you can’t actually drive a train across the country.”

Reprinted from Scope, December, 2009.

Photo Courtesy of Don Guerwitz Photography - La Pedrera. Barcelona, Spain.

Making Meaningful Use Meaningful

Making Meaningful Use Meaningful

A short three years ago, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) was funded at a level of less than $150 million. Today, thanks to the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (HITECH)—part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)—the ONC received a budget of over $2 billion. In addition, no less than an additional $19 billion is set aside to facilitate the adoption of electronic medical records over the next decade.

For both industry and government, budgets provide a more reliable picture of strategy than do policy statements. Therefore, there is little doubt that the current administration expects health information technology to play an important role in reducing healthcare costs while improving quality, safety, and access, a high priority of the president.

To accomplish this goal, adoption of technology is not enough. These new tools must be utilized effectively to achieve desirable and measureable results. Therefore, almost all of the incentive funding available to providers for the adoption of health information technology is tied to the “meaningful use” of that technology.

So what is “meaningful use?” Perhaps former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart provides some guidance. In a 1964 opinion on an obscenity case (Jacobellis v. Ohio) the late Justice Stewart described hard-core pornography as follows:

“It is hard to define, but I know it when I see it”

In spite of the work performed by many ONC committees to date, many working in healthcare believe the ONC is taking the same approach to defining “meaningful use.”

To its credit, the ONC is working to offer providers a hard and fast definition of meaningful use backed up by exactly defined, collectable measures. By statute, the secretary of health and human services has until December 31, 2009, to issue an interim rule on meaningful use. As the rule must go out for comment for a minimum period of time, a final rule is not expected until late Q1, 2010.

Source: Making Meaningful Use “Meaningful” – PSQH, November/December, 2009

Photo Courtesy of Don Guerwitz PhotographyYoung Pioneers, Havana, Cuba.

HIMSS CEO Receives O Moore Medal

November 19, 2009 Health IT No Comments
HIMSS CEO Receives O Moore Medal

To honor his contribution to healthcare information technology, the Healthcare Informatics Society of Ireland awarded the prestigious O Moore Medal to H. Stephen Lieber, CEO and President of HIMSS. As current chair of the board of directors of HIMSS it was a fine moment for me, and I am sure the entire HIMSS organization, to see Steve recognized for his decade-plus long effort to promote the use of HIT to improve the quality, safety. and cost of healthcare delivery throughtout the world. Under Steve’s leadership, HIMSS has grown to more than 20,000 members from all parts of the globe with conferences held in North America, Asia, and the Middle East. At this critical time, Steve provides exceptional leadership to the healthcare arena.

Please take a moment to watch the presentation of the medal to Steve and his acceptance remarks (Dublin, Ireland, November 19, 2009).

Barry P. Chaiken, MD, FHIMSS

DocsNetwork Events

Healthcare Blogs

Health IT Organizations

  • Rash, and Rashes The Art of Skin Diagnosis – SkinSight - “Rash, and Rashes The Art of Skin Diagnosis” is an open access connected to diagnostic decision support. The tutorial is a wonderful example of augmenting traditional classroom medical education with sustainable HIT and decision support.
  • HIMSS - Health Information Management Systems Society
  • HIMSS Europe - HIMSS Europe and World of Health IT
  • AMIA - American Medical Informatics Association
  • IHI - Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Publications

  • PSQH - Patient Safety and Quality Healthcare Journal
  • WTN Media - Wisconsin Technology Network

Resources

  • Logical Images - Logical Images develops visual medical technology and resources that increase diagnostic accuracy, enhance medical education, and heighten patient knowledge.
  • Imprivata, Inc. - Imprivata develops enterprise authentication and access management solutions.
  • Evolvent Technology - Evolvent is a healthcare systems company with services ranging from program assessments to global implementations.
  • Symphony Corporation - Symphony Corporation is a global consulting and technology services company.
  • Medting - MEDTING is an interactive platform on web for the medical professionals over the world to share their knowledge.
  • TurnKeough Corporation - TurnKeough Corp. brings healthcare industry clients impactful advice on market positioning for optimal brand recognition of potential products.
  • Don Gurewitz Photography - – Internationally recognized travel photographer offering unique specially printed limited edition photographs.

Past Events

Interests

Archives